Reporting - Revision history

Mikael Häggström: /* Tailoring */ Wording

2019-09-24T11:35:12Z

Tailoring: Wording

2019-09-24T11:26:29Z

Moved

2019-07-30T06:40:58Z

Tailoring: Acronyms

2019-05-29T12:16:14Z

Depth: Example

2019-05-29T12:08:10Z

Depth: Grouping

2019-04-30T08:43:08Z

Tailoring: Automatic

2019-04-30T08:40:09Z

Tailoring: Detailed

2019-02-28T07:30:03Z

Tailoring: Grammar

2019-01-30T18:28:45Z

Depth: Lack of explanation

2019-01-14T07:56:17Z

Tailoring: Important findings near the top

@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 ==Tailoring==
-The information contained in the reporting sections in Radlines assume that the clinician has requested the imaging for the topic of the article at hand, but should be tailored to any particular questions or requests by the clinician. Any relevant findings beyond the issues or questions raised by the clinician should also be mentioned. For automatically generated titles, you may need to correct or make a note of any difference to the projections at hand.
+The information contained in the reporting sections in Radlines assume that the clinician has requested the imaging for the topic of the article at hand, but should be tailored to any particular questions or requests by the clinician. Any relevant findings beyond the issues or questions raised by the clinician should also be mentioned. For automatically generated titles in digital reports, you may need to correct or make a note of any difference to the given projections.
 The most important findings can be moved to near the top of the report if feasible, but doctors performing subsequent double-reading may prefer a consistent anatomic order.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 }}
-Following are general notes on reporting on radiology images. For guidelines on writing reporting guidelines in Radlines, see [[Radlines:Editorial guidelines]].
+Following are general notes on reporting on radiology images.
 ==Depth==
@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 ==See also==
 *[[Radlines:Disclaimers]]
 *[[Evaluation]]
 {{Bottom}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 30 July 2019
Line 55:		Line 55:

	If a certain grammatical rule has a risk of making the report less clear to the reader, ignore it.		If a certain grammatical rule has a risk of making the report less clear to the reader, ignore it.
		+
		+	Restrict acronyms/abbreviations to those who are certainly well known among all doctors, such as "cm".<ref name="NarodAhmed2016" group="notes">Acronyms/abbreviations increase reading speed only if the reader is familiar with the abbreviated terms:<br>- {{cite journal\|last1=Narod\|first1=S.A.\|last2=Ahmed\|first2=H.\|last3=Akbari\|first3=M.R.\|title=Countercurrents: Do acronyms belong in the medical literature?\|journal=Current Oncology\|volume=23\|issue=5\|year=2016\|pages=295\|issn=1718-7729\|doi=10.3747/co.23.3122}}</ref>

	==See also==		==See also==

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *Lack of '''explanation''' from existing evidence. In contrast, in for example an [[X-ray of the foot]] in a patient with foot pain, the finding of a fracture generally makes is unnecessary to report on for example very small calcaneal spurs.
-Multiple instances of the same type of pathology (such as lung nodules or diseased joints) can often simply be reported as such, at least with a particular mention of the largest or the most severe example thereof.
+Multiple instances of the same type of pathology (such as lung nodules or diseased joints) can often simply be reported as such, at least with a particular mention of the largest or the most severe example thereof, such as ''"at least moderate joint space narrowing and erosions of the DIP-joints, being severe at dig-III"''.
 ==Comparison==

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *Lack of '''previous reports''', whose minor findings can often be summarized similar to "otherwise no additional findings since previous exam on [date]".
 *Lack of '''explanation''' from existing evidence. In contrast, in for example an [[X-ray of the foot]] in a patient with foot pain, the finding of a fracture generally makes is unnecessary to report on for example very small calcaneal spurs.
 ==Comparison==

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:30, 28 February 2019
Line 51:		Line 51:

	Strive to keep the most important findings near the top of the report if feasible.		Strive to keep the most important findings near the top of the report if feasible.
		+
		+	If a certain grammatical rule has a risk of making the report less clear to the reader, ignore it.

	==See also==		==See also==