Pelvimetry

From radlines.org
Revision as of 18:39, 2 July 2018 by Mikael Häggström (talk | contribs) (+Report)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Author: Mikael Häggström [notes 1]

Planning

Indication

A review in 2003 considered routine performance of pelvimetry to be a waste of time, a potential liability, and an unnecessary discomfort.[1] A woman's pelvis loosens up before birth by hormones, so an investigation before labor do not represent the physiologic capacity of the birth canal. Still, pelvimetry can be indicated when a woman has had failure to progress in a previous pregnancy.

Choice of investigation

Low-dose 3D CT can be used for estimating pelvimetry parameters.[2]

Interpretation

Parameter Image
(maximum intensity projection)
Definition Normal measures
Pelvic inlet Transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet 170px 13 to 14.5 cm.[2]
Obstetric conjugate 120px
Median plane
The line between the narrowest bony points formed by the sacral promontory and the inner pubic arch 10 to 12 cm.[2]
Interspinous distance 170px The line between the narrowest bone points connects the ischial spines 9.5 to 11.5 cm.[3]
Pelvic outlet Sagittal pelvic outlet diameter¨ 120px 9.5 to 11.5 cm.[3]
Intertuberous diameter 150px 10 to 12 cm.[3]

Report

The length of each of the distances above, and a mention of whether any is decreased.

References

  1. "A retrospective review of performance and utility of routine clinical pelvimetry ". Family Medicine 36 (7): 505–7. 2004. PMID 15243832. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 "Pelvimetry by Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Non-Pregnant Multiparous Women Who Delivered Vaginally ". Polish Journal of Radiology 81: 219–27. 2016. doi:10.12659/PJR.896380. PMID 27231494. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 "Magnetic resonance pelvimetry for trial of labour after a previous caesarean section ". Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal 10 (2): 210–4. August 2010. PMID 21509231. 


Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "notes", but no corresponding <references group="notes"/> tag was found, or a closing </ref> is missing